Visa reason code 10.4: what it means and how to respond
Visa 10.4 covers card-absent fraud disputes. See who files, how CE3.0 supports a response, and the Visa deadlines that apply.
What Visa reason code 10.4 means and when it applies
Visa reason code 10.4, “Other Fraud – Card-Absent Environment,” applies when the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in a transaction. The transaction took place in a card-absent environmentThis is a transaction completed without the physical card presented to the merchant, such as an online, telephone, or mail order, or a recurring transaction.. This may happen because someone else used the payment details or because the cardholder did not recognize the merchant name on the statement.
For an issuer to file a 10.4 dispute, all of these requirements must be present:
- The transaction occurred without the card present. It was completed, for example, through e-commerce, by telephone or mail, or as a recurring transaction.
- The cardholder denies the transaction. The cardholder states that they neither authorized nor participated in it.
- The issuer completed the pre-dispute steps. The bank that issued the card reported the Fraud Activity to Visa before filing the case and certified the cardholder’s denial.
- The issuer met the deadline. It filed the dispute within 120 calendar days of the Transaction Processing Date.
Source for the requirements: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.1, Table 11-26 (ID# 0030252), §11.7.5.2, Table 11-27 (ID# 0030253), and §11.7.5.5, Table 11-30 (ID# 0030256). Source for the deadline: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.4, Table 11-29 (ID# 0030255).
Even when those requirements are met, the dispute is invalid if at least one of Visa’s exclusion conditions applies. Examples include authentication that shifts liability to the issuer, a credit or reversal already processed, the cardholder withdrawing the dispute, or the acquirer meeting CE3.0 criteria. These conditions are alternatives; they do not need to occur together.
Source for the invalidity conditions: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.3, Table 11-28 (ID# 0030254).
In practice, the issuer sends the transaction back to the acquirer and disputes the amount. If the dispute remains valid, the acquirer may pass the loss to the merchant. If Visa permits a defense, the merchant gives the records to the acquirer, which responds on the merchant’s behalf.
If these conditions do not describe the case, check the correct code: 10.1 and 10.2 for fraud subject to the EMV liability shift; 10.3 for card-present fraud; and 10.5 for a transaction identified by Visa’s fraud monitoring program.
Deadlines for each party under Visa 10.4
1 block represents 10 calendar days.
- IssuerFile the 10.4 disputeThe clock starts when Visa processes the transaction.Up to 120 calendar days
- AcquirerSubmit a Visa-accepted defense pathThe clock starts when Visa processes the dispute.Up to 30 calendar days
- IssuerRespond to the acquirer’s defenseThe clock starts when Visa processes the acquirer’s defense.Up to 30 calendar days
- AcquirerAsk Visa to decide the caseThe clock starts when Visa processes the issuer’s response.Up to 10 calendar days
Who files the dispute and what happens next
The issuer files the 10.4 dispute in VROLVisa Resolve Online is Visa’s system where the issuer files the dispute and the acquirer submits the response and case documents.. The merchant does not respond directly to Visa.
After filing, the acquirer investigates the case. If it finds a defense path, it collects the merchant’s documents and submits a Pre-Arbitration AttemptThis is the acquirer’s formal request for the issuer to reconsider the dispute before the case goes to Visa for a decision. in VROL. Visa gives the acquirer 30 calendar days from the Dispute Processing Date. A 10.4 dispute has no separate representment step.
The issuer has 30 calendar days to accept financial responsibility or decline the Pre-Arbitration Attempt. If the acquirer supplied Compelling Evidence, a decline requires one of two certifications: the contact information does not match the issuer’s cardholder records; or the issuer contacted the cardholder and explains why the cardholder still disputes the transaction. When the issuer or merchant is in the Europe Region, only the second option is accepted. The issuer must also explain an AVS Y result supplied by the merchant.
After a decline, the acquirer has 10 calendar days to take the case to Visa Arbitration when the rules allow it. This step may involve fees.
Source for the response flow and deadlines: Visa Core Rules §11.2.2, Table 11-1 (ID# 0030212), and §11.7.5.6, Table 11-31 (ID# 0030257). Source for the regional certification rule: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, p. 56.
Before building a defense, check whether this dispute is invalidProving any one condition is enough to challenge the dispute's validity.
- The transaction was authenticated: Visa Secure ECI 5 with Authentication Confirmation and CAVV; an Authenticated Payment Credential with ECI 5, TAVV, and approved Cardholder Verification; or EMV 3DS ECI 6 Attempt with CAVV, except for a non-reloadable prepaid card.
- More than 35 disputes were initiated on the Account Number within the previous 120 calendar days.
- The transaction was approved using a Payment Credential for which the issuer had already reported Fraud Activity, or the Fraud Activity was reported with fraud type code 3, C, or D.
- A credit or reversal was already processed for the same transaction, or the cardholder no longer disputes the purchase.
- The cardholder participated in the transaction but says they were deceived into sending non-fiat currency or an NFT to a fraudulent recipient; this type of fraud is outside 10.4.
- The transaction is an excluded type or scenario: Emergency Cash Disbursement, Straight Through Processing, Mobile Push Payment, Visa Commercial Choice Omni, certain CVV2 result-code cases, a qualifying delayed charge linked to a prior stay, or specified US Domestic airline or AVS cases.
- The acquirer meets the CE3.0 criteria—same merchant through October 23, 2026; same Card or a related Payment Credential from October 24, 2026—and liability shifts back to the issuer.
Source:Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.3 — Invalid Disputes, ID# 0030254
How to reduce the risk of a Visa 10.4 dispute
Visa recommends three practices for card-absent transactions:
- Use Visa SecureVisa’s service based on 3-D Secure lets the issuer authenticate the cardholder during an online purchase. The result is recorded in the authorization., CVV2The security code printed on the card that a merchant may request in a card-absent transaction to help verify the payment details provided., and AVSAddress Verification Service compares the address provided in the transaction with the cardholder address held by the issuer.. These tools help authenticate the cardholder and identify fraud signals before approval.
- Request authorization for every transaction. This applies to online, mail order, telephone order, and recurring transactions, regardless of the amount.
- Identify the transaction environment correctly. Record a transaction as card absent only when it was actually completed through that channel.
Also retain the order, delivery, access, and device data for each transaction. These records do not prevent fraud on their own, but they may be essential to show cardholder participation or build the history CE3.0 requires.
Source for the prevention measures: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Condition 10.4, p. 24. Source for the defense records: Visa Compelling Evidence 3.0 Merchant Readiness, p. 1.
Recurring card-absent fraud feeds Visa’s monitoring and, at excessive levels, can place the acquirer under the Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP). The thresholds, fees, and effective dates for Brazil are in our guide to VAMP in Brazil.
Evidence the merchant and acquirer need to gather
The merchant gives the documents to the acquirer, which submits the Pre-Arbitration Attempt. To respond to a 10.4 dispute, the merchant needs to follow one path Visa accepts. Within the chosen path, however, every item marked as required must be present.
One path is to show that the dispute is already resolved or invalid. The acquirer may provide, for example, a credit or reversal record the issuer did not address, a letter or email in which the cardholder withdraws the dispute, or authentication data that makes the 10.4 dispute invalid.
Source for this path: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.6, Table 11-31 (ID# 0030257). Source for the cardholder letter or email: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Condition 10.4, p. 24.
Another path is Compelling Evidence 3.0 (CE3.0)Compelling Evidence 3.0 is Visa’s mechanism exclusive to 10.4 that compares the disputed transaction with exactly two prior undisputed transactions to establish a consistent history of use.. For disputes processed through October 23, 2026, all of these requirements must be met:
- Use exactly three transactions. The set includes the disputed transaction and exactly two prior undisputed transactions made with the same Payment Credential at the same merchant. The issuer must not have reported Fraud Activity on either prior transaction.
- Use the required history window. Each prior transaction must have been processed more than 120 and no more than 365 calendar days before the Dispute Processing Date. The 120-day minimum does not apply when the prior transactions are Original Credit Transactions (OCTs)An Original Credit Transaction sends funds to a card instead of charging it for a purchase. Here, the exception removes only the 120-day minimum..
- Describe what was provided. All three transactions must include a detailed description of the merchandise or service and the date it was provided.
- Match the data. At least two of these four groups must match across all three transactions: customer account or login ID, full delivery address, device ID or fingerprintThese are technical identifiers for the device used in the transaction. Visa treats the ID and fingerprint as one data group, so they cannot count as two matches., and IP addressThis is the public address of the connection used by the device in the transaction. For CE3.0, it can help link the transactions to the same history of use.. At least one match must be the IP address or the device ID or fingerprint.
Starting October 24, 2026, the two prior transactions may use the same Card or a related Payment Credential at one or more merchants. The acquirer may submit only transaction data that it accepted and processed. All other requirements, including the history window and data matching, continue to apply.
CE3.0 allows only one attempt per dispute. If the acquirer submits incomplete or incorrect data, Visa will reject the attempt and will not accept another CE3.0 submission for the same case.
Source for the CE3.0 requirements: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.3, Table 11-28 (ID# 0030254), and §11.7.5.6, Table 11-31 (ID# 0030257). Source for the single-attempt and data-matching rules: Visa Compelling Evidence 3.0 Merchant Readiness, pp. 1 and 3.
If CE3.0 does not fit, the acquirer may use Compelling EvidenceThis is the formal category of documents Visa accepts to show that the cardholder received, used, or participated in the disputed transaction.. The 10.4 column accepts items 1 through 14 and 16 in Visa’s chart. The merchant needs to meet one item that applies to the case, while following that item’s internal logic. For digital goods, for example, the description and download date and time are required, plus at least two of the records Visa lists. For a recurring transaction, the contract, evidence of use, and one prior undisputed transaction are all required. Item 15 does not apply to 10.4.
The paths above cover the options most likely to apply to an e-commerce merchant. The chart also provides transaction-specific documentation for store pickup, physical delivery, mail or telephone orders, passenger transport, travel and entertainment, lodging with a virtual Card, a purchase by a family member, a digital wallet in Europe, and the acquisition of cryptocurrency or an NFT.
Source for the Compelling Evidence items: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Compelling Evidence chart, items 1 through 14 and 16, pp. 51–55.
Finally, the rule provides separate paths for certain cases. A delayed charge for lodging, travel, or rental requires both pieces of evidence: the link to the earlier stay, trip, or rental and the record showing that card data was captured during that period. For an airline ticket, the acquirer may use the cardholder’s name on the departed-flight manifest if it matches the name on the purchased itinerary.
Source for the transaction-specific Pre-Arbitration paths: Visa Core Rules §11.7.5.6, Table 11-31 (ID# 0030257).
Frequently asked questions
When does Visa use chargeback code 10.4?
Visa uses the dispute condition "Other Fraud – Card-Absent Environment" when the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in a transaction conducted without the card present. This includes e-commerce, telephone order, mail order, and recurring transactions.
How can a merchant respond to a Visa 10.4 chargeback?
The merchant gives the documentation to the acquirer, which may submit a Pre-Arbitration Attempt in VROL within 30 calendar days of the Dispute Processing Date. There is no separate representment step. The response must follow one path Visa accepts, such as showing that the dispute is invalid, providing CE3.0, meeting an applicable item in the Compelling Evidence chart, or documenting another transaction-specific situation in the rule.
How does CE3.0 work for Visa 10.4?
Compelling Evidence 3.0 is a defense mechanism exclusive to code 10.4. It combines the disputed transaction with exactly two prior undisputed transactions. Each prior transaction must have been processed more than 120 and no more than 365 days before the Dispute Processing Date. All three must include a description and the date of the merchandise or service provided, plus at least 2 of 4 matching data groups: IP address, device, full delivery address, and customer account or login ID. At least one match must be the IP address or device.
Can a merchant try CE3.0 more than once for the same dispute?
No. Only one CE3.0 attempt may be submitted for the dispute. If the acquirer submits incomplete or incorrect data, Visa will reject the attempt, and CE3.0 cannot be resubmitted for the same dispute.
How does 3-D Secure affect a Visa 10.4 dispute?
Under Visa’s invalidity rules, Visa Secure ECI 5 with Authentication Confirmation and CAVV makes a 10.4 dispute invalid. The same applies to an Authenticated Payment Credential with ECI 5, TAVV, and approved Cardholder Verification, or to EMV 3DS ECI 6 Attempt with CAVV, except for a non-reloadable prepaid card.
How long does the issuer have to file a Visa 10.4 dispute?
The issuer has 120 calendar days from the Transaction Processing Date.
View all Visa chargeback reason codes or return to Knowledge.