Visa reason code 10.3: what it means and how to respond
Visa 10.3 covers key-entered card-present fraud. See when it applies, how US Compelling Evidence works, and the response deadlines.
What Visa reason code 10.3 means and when it applies
Visa reason code 10.3, “Other Fraud – Card-Present Environment,” is filed when the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in a key-entered transactionAlso called a keyed transaction. It is an in-person sale where the card data is typed into the terminal instead of the magnetic stripe or chip being read. in a card-present environmentA transaction completed with the physical card at the point of sale, including when the card data is keyed into the terminal, as opposed to an online or telephone purchase..
For a transaction to qualify for code 10.3, all of these facts must be present:
- The cardholder denies the purchase. The cardholder states that they neither authorized nor participated in the transaction.
- The card data was keyed in. The sale was not recorded as a magnetic-stripe swipe or chip read.
- The transaction was classified as card-present. If the purchase was completed online, by mail, or by telephone, it took place in a card-absent environment and the applicable code is 10.4.
Source for the requirements: Visa Core Rules §11.7.4.1, Table 11-20 (ID# 0030245).
Even when all three facts are present, code 10.3 is invalid if at least one condition in Table 11-22 applies. The two conditions involving previously reported Fraud Activity are independent: the exception for fraud types C and D or declined transactions limits one ground, but it does not cancel the separate ground that invalidates a credential reported with fraud type 3, C, or D.
The delayed-charge exception applies only when all of these records are present: message reason code 3902 in field 63.3, a Transaction ID in field 125 or 62.2 linking the charge to an earlier stay, trip, or rental, and an Electronic ImprintA record created when the magnetic stripe or chip is read and the card data is captured or imprinted at the point of sale. obtained during the same period. The other independent alternatives appear in this page’s invalidity panel.
Source for the invalidity conditions: Visa Core Rules §11.7.4.3, Table 11-22 (ID# 0030247). Definitions: Visa Core Rules §4.14.4.2 and Glossary, IDs 0024593, 0030053, and 0030586.
In practice, code 10.3 covers in-person fraud recorded as manual key entry. If the magnetic stripe or chip was read, the authorization data can disprove the central fact behind the code. If the case involves the EMV liability shift, see 10.1 for a counterfeit card or 10.2 for a lost, stolen, or not-received card.
Deadlines for each party under Visa 10.3
1 block represents 10 calendar days.
- IssuerFile the 10.3 disputeThe clock starts when Visa processes the transaction.Up to 120 calendar days
- AcquirerSubmit a Visa-permitted defense pathThe clock starts when Visa processes the dispute.Up to 30 calendar days
- IssuerRespond to the acquirer’s defenseThe clock starts when Visa processes the acquirer’s defense.Up to 30 calendar days
- AcquirerAsk Visa to decide the caseThe clock starts when Visa processes the issuer’s response.Up to 10 calendar days
Who files the dispute and what happens next
The issuer, the bank that issued the card, files code 10.3 in VROLVisa Resolve Online is Visa’s system where the issuer files the dispute and the acquirer submits the response and case documents.. Before filing, the issuer must have reported the Fraud Activity to Visa. It must also formally certify that the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in the transaction. That certification is stored in the dispute record; it is not a letter from the cardholder.
The issuer has 120 calendar days from the Transaction Processing Date to file the case. These requirements are cumulative: the prior fraud report does not replace the cardholder certification, and neither replaces the deadline.
Source for filing the dispute: Visa Core Rules §11.7.4.2, Table 11-21 (ID# 0030246), §11.7.4.4, Table 11-23 (ID# 0030248), and §11.7.4.5, Table 11-24 (ID# 0030249).
When the issuer files code 10.3, Visa initially assigns financial responsibility to the acquirer, the institution that represents the merchant in the network. The merchant gives its documents to the acquirer, and the acquirer tries to shift that responsibility through a Pre-Arbitration AttemptThe acquirer’s formal request for the issuer to reconsider the dispute before the case proceeds to a Visa decision.. Code 10.3 has no separate representment step.
The acquirer has 30 calendar days from the Dispute Processing Date to submit the attempt. It is not available if the merchant already accepted the case through Rapid Dispute ResolutionVisa’s automated process in which the merchant accepts the dispute before pre-arbitration. After acceptance, this response path is no longer available.. If the issuer declines the Pre-Arbitration Attempt, the acquirer may escalate the case to Visa within 10 calendar days of the response Processing Date.
Source for the process: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, pp. 5–6. Source for the response deadlines: Visa Core Rules §11.2.2, Table 11-1 (ID# 0030212), and §11.7.4.6, Table 11-25 (ID# 0030250).
Before building a defense, check whether this dispute is invalidProving any one condition is enough to challenge the dispute's validity.
- The transaction is an ATM Cash Disbursement.
- The transaction is an Emergency Cash Disbursement.
- The transaction is a Mobile Push Payment, a payment or movement of funds initiated by the cardholder on a mobile phone or tablet.
- The transaction was approved using a Payment Credential for which the issuer had already reported Fraud Activity. This ground does not apply when the report used fraud type C or D, or when it concerns declined transactions.
- The issuer reported the Payment Credential using fraud type code 3, C, or D.
- The transaction uses Visa Commercial Choice Omni, Visa’s virtual-account product for business-to-business payments.
- The transaction is a Mobility and Transport Transaction, a contactless payment at an unattended fare gate or other access point calculated from one or more taps during the trip.
- The transaction is an Automated Fuel Dispenser (AFD) transaction at a Chip-Reading Device — US Region only.
- The transaction has an Electronic Imprint, a record created when the magnetic stripe or chip is read and the card data is captured or imprinted at the point of sale.
- The delayed-charge condition applies: field 63.3 contains message reason code 3902, field 125 or 62.2 links the charge to the prior stay, trip, or rental, and an Electronic Imprint was obtained during the same period.
Source:Visa Core Rules §11.7.4, Tabela 11-22 — Invalid Disputes, ID# 0030247
How to reduce the risk of this reason code
Visa recommends three steps to prevent new 10.3 disputes:
- Read the card for card-present sales. Use the magnetic stripe or chip as required for the transaction instead of keying in the card data for convenience.
- If the card cannot be read, take a manual imprintA physical impression of the card’s embossed data made with a manual imprinter. A pencil, pen, or crayon rubbing and a photocopy are not valid.. Obtain it at the point of sale and keep a legible copy. This response does not apply to transactions in the Europe Region.
- Train staff to handle terminal failures. Staff should follow the acquirer’s procedures for reading or keying the card and retaining the records.
Classify the transaction environment correctly as well. A purchase made online, by telephone, or by mail does not become card-present because its data was later keyed into a terminal. Recording it in the wrong environment may lead the issuer to file the wrong dispute code.
Source for causes and prevention: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Condition 10.3, p. 22. Source for the imprint definition and validity: Visa Core Rules, Glossary, IDs 0024593, 0024713, and 0024815, and §11.7.4.6, Table 11-25 (ID# 0030250).
Evidence the merchant and acquirer need to gather
First identify which situation applies. In pre-arbitration, the acquirer selects exactly one applicable path; the paths do not stack. Within the selected path, every required item must accompany the response. The evidence panel organizes the principal paths available to US and international merchants and states their regional limits.
The most direct evidence is the authorization recordThe electronic record of the transaction approval. Here, it must show how the card data was captured and identify the transaction and point of sale. proving that the magnetic stripe was swiped or the chip was read. It disproves that the transaction was key-entered. If that did not happen, check whether another path applies: a manual imprint, a processed credit or reversal, a written cardholder withdrawal, invalidity under Table 11-22, or a qualifying delayed charge.
For a delayed charge, both pieces of evidence are required: the link to an earlier stay, trip, or rental and an Imprint obtained during that same period, including an approved authorization with an Electronic Imprint.
Source for the pre-arbitration paths: Visa Core Rules §11.7.4.6, Table 11-25 (ID# 0030250). Source for merchant evidence: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Condition 10.3, p. 22.
Do not confuse this path with the invalidity rule explained at the beginning. The Table 11-25 Pre-Arbitration Attempt requires the two pieces of documentary evidence above. The Table 11-22 exception instead requires all of the message records listed there.
For a qualifying US Domestic transaction, Compelling EvidenceVisa’s formal evidence category. For code 10.3, it is available only for a qualifying US Domestic card-present transaction that was key-entered and did not take place at a Chip-Reading Device. is an additional defense path. Table 11-25 permits it for a card-present transaction that was key-entered and did not take place at a Chip-Reading Device. The merchant may prove that the same card was used in a previous or subsequent undisputed transaction or provide both the identification presented by the cardholder and a receipt, invoice, or contract linked to that identification. Outside the US, Compelling Evidence is not a code 10.3 path. Separately, the manual-imprint response does not apply in the Europe Region.
Source for the regional restriction: Visa Core Rules §11.7.4.6, Table 11-25 (ID# 0030250). Source for the two Compelling Evidence alternatives: Visa Dispute Management Guidelines for Visa Merchants, Item 15 and note 7, p. 54.
Frequently asked questions
When does Visa use chargeback code 10.3?
Visa uses the dispute condition "Other Fraud – Card-Present Environment" when the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in a key-entered transaction completed in a card-present environment. The card data was typed into the terminal instead of being read from the magnetic stripe or chip.
How does 10.3 differ from codes 10.1, 10.2, and 10.4?
Code 10.3 is the residual card-present fraud code. It applies only when the transaction is outside the EMV liability shift covered by 10.1 for counterfeit fraud and 10.2 for lost, stolen, or not-received cards. It also does not apply to a card-absent transaction, which is covered by 10.4.
How does an acquirer respond to a Visa 10.3 chargeback?
Code 10.3 follows the Fraud Allocation flow and has no second presentment. The acquirer’s only response is a Pre-Arbitration Attempt submitted within 30 calendar days of the Dispute Processing Date. Pre-arbitration is unavailable if the merchant already accepted the dispute through Rapid Dispute Resolution.
What evidence directly rebuts a Visa 10.3 dispute?
The most direct evidence is a copy of the authorization record showing that the magnetic stripe was swiped or the chip was read at the point of sale. This disproves the key-entered premise of the code. A valid manual imprint may also be used outside Europe, and other paths include a credit or reversal, a written cardholder withdrawal, an invalid dispute, or a qualifying delayed charge.
Can a US merchant use Compelling Evidence for Visa 10.3?
Yes, for a US Domestic card-present transaction that was key-entered and did not take place at a Chip-Reading Device. The merchant can show an undisputed previous or subsequent transaction made with the same card, or provide both the identification presented by the cardholder and a receipt, invoice, or contract linked to that identification.
How long does the issuer have to file a Visa 10.3 dispute?
The issuer has 120 calendar days from the Transaction Processing Date. Before filing, it must report the Fraud Activity to Visa and certify that the cardholder denies authorizing or participating in the transaction.
View all Visa chargeback reason codes or return to Knowledge.